1986 Audi 200 vs. 2011 Ford C-Max
To start off, 2011 Ford C-Max is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 2011 Ford C-Max. (150 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford C-Max. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Ford C-Max weights approximately 70 kg more than 1986 Audi 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Ford C-Max (270 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 200. (252 Nm @ 3600 RPM). This means 2011 Ford C-Max will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 200.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 2011 Ford C-Max | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 200 | C-Max |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1596 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 150 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 252 Nm | 270 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3600 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1480 kg | 1550 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1828 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1684 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2788 mm |