1986 Audi 200 vs. 2011 Holden Epica
To start off, 2011 Holden Epica is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,492 cc (6 cylinders), 2011 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP) has 27 more horse power than 2011 Holden Epica. (153 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Epica.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm) has 15 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Epica. (237 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 2011 Holden Epica | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 200 | Epica |
Year Released | 1986 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 2492 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 153 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 237 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2700 mm |