1986 Audi 200 vs. 2012 Holden Cruze
To start off, 2012 Holden Cruze is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 200 would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 200 (180 HP) has 70 more horse power than 2012 Holden Cruze. (110 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 200 should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 200 (252 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Cruze. (153 Nm). This means 1986 Audi 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Cruze.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 200 | 2012 Holden Cruze | |
Make | Audi | Holden |
Model | 200 | Cruze |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2144 cc | 1598 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 180 HP | 110 HP |
Torque | 252 Nm | 153 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4800 mm | 4597 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1788 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1477 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2685 mm |