1986 Audi 4000 vs. 2013 Ford E-Series
To start off, 2013 Ford E-Series is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 4000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 4000 would be higher. At 5,400 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 Ford E-Series is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Ford E-Series (252 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 152 more horse power than 1986 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Ford E-Series should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 4000.
Because 1986 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Ford E-Series. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Ford E-Series (474 Nm) has 337 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 2013 Ford E-Series will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 4000 | 2013 Ford E-Series | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 4000 | E-Series |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2144 cc | 5400 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 252 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4250 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Torque | 137 Nm | 474 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 79.2 mm | 90 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 106 mm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 12 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4490 mm | 5504 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2017 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 2111 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3505 mm |
