1986 Audi 80 vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1986 Audi 80 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 80 (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 80 weights approximately 116 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 80 (160 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1986 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 1046 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |