1986 Audi 80 vs. 1964 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1986 Audi 80 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,781 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 80 (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1964 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1964 Nissan Cedric weights approximately 39 kg more than 1986 Audi 80.
Because 1964 Nissan Cedric is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Audi 80. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 Nissan Cedric will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 80 (160 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 1964 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | Cedric |
Year Released | 1986 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1046 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2540 mm |