1986 Audi 80 vs. 1969 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1986 Audi 80 is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,962 cc, 1969 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 80 (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (93 HP @ 7000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 80 weights approximately 106 kg more than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1969 Mazda Cosmo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Mazda Cosmo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 80 (160 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1969 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1969 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 1969 Mazda Cosmo | |
Make | Audi | Mazda |
Model | 80 | Cosmo |
Year Released | 1986 | 1969 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1962 cc |
Engine Type | in-line | dual-disk rotary |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 133 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1046 kg | 940 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4150 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1600 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1170 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 57 L |