1986 Audi 80 vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1986 Audi 80 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Chevrolet Camaro would be higher. At 2,835 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (101 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1986 Audi 80. (59 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 80.
Because 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (192 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 92 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 80. (100 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1296 cc | 2835 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 101 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 100 Nm | 192 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4390 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2580 mm |