1986 Audi 80 vs. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 80 would be higher. At 3,135 cc (6 cylinders), 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro (138 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1986 Audi 80. (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 354 kg more than 1986 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1992 Chevrolet Camaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1992 Chevrolet Camaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Chevrolet Camaro (244 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 84 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 80. (160 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 1992 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 1992 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 80 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1986 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 3135 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 244 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86.4 mm | 84 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1046 kg | 1400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2570 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 68 L |