1986 Audi 80 vs. 2000 Mazda 626

To start off, 2000 Mazda 626 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 80 (115 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2000 Mazda 626. (100 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 2000 Mazda 626. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mazda 626 weights approximately 246 kg more than 1986 Audi 80.

Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Mazda 626 (392 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 219 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 80. (173 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2000 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 80.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Audi 80 2000 Mazda 626
Make Audi Mazda
Model 80 626
Year Released 1986 2000
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 2496 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 115 HP 100 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6500 RPM
Torque 173 Nm 392 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 82.5 mm 84.6 mm
Engine Stroke Size 92.8 mm 74 mm
Drive Type 4WD 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1140 kg 1386 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 4610 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1810 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1420 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 2620 mm