1986 Audi 80 vs. 2004 Ford E-350
To start off, 2004 Ford E-350 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 80 would be higher. At 5,408 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-350 (255 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 1986 Audi 80. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-350 weights approximately 1348 kg more than 1986 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-350 (475 Nm) has 302 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 80. (173 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Audi 80 | 2004 Ford E-350 | |
| Make | Audi | Ford |
| Model | 80 | E-350 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1984 cc | 5408 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 115 HP | 255 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 173 Nm | 475 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 90.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 106 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 2488 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 5900 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 2020 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 2140 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3510 mm |
