1986 Audi 80 vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Colt
To start off, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is newer by 20 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 80 would be higher. At 2,972 cc, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (179 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1986 Audi 80. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 80.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Colt (255 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 80. (173 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Colt will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 2006 Mitsubishi Colt | |
Make | Audi | Mitsubishi |
Model | 80 | Colt |
Year Released | 1986 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 2972 cc |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 179 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 173 Nm | 255 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 91.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 4940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1810 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2970 mm |