1986 Audi 80 vs. 2008 Ford Ka
To start off, 2008 Ford Ka is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,984 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 80 weights approximately 253 kg more than 2008 Ford Ka.
Because 1986 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Ford Ka. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 80 (173 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Ford Ka. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Ford Ka.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 2008 Ford Ka | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 80 | Ka |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1984 cc | 1297 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 173 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.5 mm | 74.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 92.8 mm | 75.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 10.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1140 kg | 887 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4400 mm | 3630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2450 mm |