1986 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Jaguar XJ

To start off, 2009 Jaguar XJ is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 80 would be higher. At 4,196 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Jaguar XJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jaguar XJ (400 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1986 Audi 80. (115 HP @ 5300 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jaguar XJ should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 80. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jaguar XJ weights approximately 594 kg more than 1986 Audi 80. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Audi 80 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Jaguar XJ. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Audi 80 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jaguar XJ (560 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 387 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 80. (173 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Jaguar XJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 80. 2009 Jaguar XJ has automatic transmission and 1986 Audi 80 has manual transmission. 1986 Audi 80 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jaguar XJ will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Audi 80 2009 Jaguar XJ
Make Audi Jaguar
Model 80 XJ
Year Released 1986 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1984 cc 4196 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Horse Power 115 HP 400 HP
Engine RPM 5300 RPM 6100 RPM
Torque 173 Nm 560 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 10.5:1 9.1:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type 4WD Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Weight 1140 kg 1734 kg
Vehicle Length 4400 mm 5220 mm
Vehicle Width 1700 mm 1950 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1460 mm
Wheelbase Size 2550 mm 3170 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]