1986 Audi 80 vs. 2009 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2009 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 80. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 80 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Nissan X-Trail is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (137 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 1986 Audi 80. (110 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Nissan X-Trail should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 80.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Nissan X-Trail (198 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 38 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 80. (160 Nm @ 3400 RPM). This means 2009 Nissan X-Trail will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 80.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 80 | 2009 Nissan X-Trail | |
Make | Audi | Nissan |
Model | 80 | X-Trail |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1781 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 110 HP | 137 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 160 Nm | 198 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Top Speed | 191 km/hour | 182 km/hour |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4300 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1700 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2540 mm | 2640 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 65 L |