1986 Audi 90 vs. 1962 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1986 Audi 90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,388 cc (8 cylinders), 1962 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1962 Cadillac 62 (197 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1986 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1962 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1962 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1986 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1962 Cadillac 62 (582 Nm) has 413 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 90. (169 Nm). This means 1962 Cadillac 62 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 90 | 1962 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Audi | Cadillac |
Model | 90 | 62 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 6388 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 197 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 582 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 101.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 98.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 2055 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3300 mm |