1986 Audi 90 vs. 1962 Lotus Elan
To start off, 1986 Audi 90 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Lotus Elan. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Lotus Elan would be higher. At 1,994 cc (5 cylinders), 1986 Audi 90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Audi 90 (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 14 more horse power than 1962 Lotus Elan. (100 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Audi 90 should accelerate faster than 1962 Lotus Elan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Audi 90 weights approximately 460 kg more than 1962 Lotus Elan. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1986 Audi 90 (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Lotus Elan. (138 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Audi 90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Lotus Elan.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 90 | 1962 Lotus Elan | |
Make | Audi | Lotus |
Model | 90 | Elan |
Year Released | 1986 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 1496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 138 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 81 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 72.7 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 590 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 3700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1430 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1110 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2140 mm |