1986 Audi 90 vs. 2002 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2002 Ford Falcon is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 90 would be higher. At 3,984 cc (6 cylinders), 2002 Ford Falcon is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford Falcon (221 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1986 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford Falcon weights approximately 465 kg more than 1986 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Ford Falcon (357 Nm @ 3150 RPM) has 188 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 90. (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Ford Falcon will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 90 | 2002 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Audi | Ford |
Model | 90 | Falcon |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3984 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 357 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3150 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 81 mm | 92.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 77.4 mm | 99.3 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1515 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2800 mm |