1986 Audi 90 vs. 2010 Toyota Tundra
To start off, 2010 Toyota Tundra is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 90 would be higher. At 5,663 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 Toyota Tundra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Toyota Tundra (381 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 267 more horse power than 1986 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Toyota Tundra should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Toyota Tundra weights approximately 282 kg more than 1986 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2010 Toyota Tundra (544 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 375 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 90. (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Toyota Tundra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 90 | 2010 Toyota Tundra | |
Make | Audi | Toyota |
Model | 90 | Tundra |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 5663 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 381 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 544 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1332 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 5820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3710 mm |