1986 Audi 90 vs. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Audi 90. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Audi 90 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2012 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (323 HP @ 6800 RPM) has 209 more horse power than 1986 Audi 90. (114 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1986 Audi 90. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Chevrolet Camaro weights approximately 762 kg more than 1986 Audi 90. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2012 Chevrolet Camaro (376 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Audi 90. (169 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2012 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Audi 90.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Audi 90 | 2012 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Audi | Chevrolet |
Model | 90 | Camaro |
Year Released | 1986 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1994 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 5 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 114 HP | 323 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6800 RPM |
Torque | 169 Nm | 376 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1050 kg | 1812 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4470 mm | 4836 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1918 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1389 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2852 mm |