1986 Austin Maestro vs. 1952 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1986 Austin Maestro is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,274 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Austin Maestro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Austin Maestro (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 1952 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Austin Maestro should accelerate faster than 1952 Ford 12 M.
Because 1952 Ford 12 M is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Ford 12 M. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Austin Maestro | 1952 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Maestro | 12 M |
Year Released | 1986 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2500 mm |