1986 Austin Maestro vs. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1986 Austin Maestro is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 2,844 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Cadillac Cimarron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron (123 HP @ 4500 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1986 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Cadillac Cimarron should accelerate faster than 1986 Austin Maestro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1981 Cadillac Cimarron weights approximately 235 kg more than 1986 Austin Maestro. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Austin Maestro | 1981 Cadillac Cimarron | |
| Make | Austin | Cadillac |
| Model | Maestro | Cimarron |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1981 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2844 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 66 HP | 123 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1150 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1660 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2580 mm |
