1986 Austin Maestro vs. 1982 Bentley Mulsanne
To start off, 1986 Austin Maestro is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Bentley Mulsanne would be higher. At 6,750 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Bentley Mulsanne weights approximately 1335 kg more than 1986 Austin Maestro.
Because 1982 Bentley Mulsanne is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Bentley Mulsanne. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1982 Bentley Mulsanne has automatic transmission and 1986 Austin Maestro has manual transmission. 1986 Austin Maestro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1982 Bentley Mulsanne will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Austin Maestro | 1982 Bentley Mulsanne | |
Make | Austin | Bentley |
Model | Maestro | Mulsanne |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 6750 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 2250 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3070 mm |