1986 Austin Maestro vs. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton
To start off, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 5,400 cc (12 cylinders), 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton (475 HP) has 409 more horse power than 1986 Austin Maestro. (66 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Chrysler Phaeton should accelerate faster than 1986 Austin Maestro.
Because 1997 Chrysler Phaeton is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1997 Chrysler Phaeton. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton has automatic transmission and 1986 Austin Maestro has manual transmission. 1986 Austin Maestro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1997 Chrysler Phaeton will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Austin Maestro | 1997 Chrysler Phaeton | |
Make | Austin | Chrysler |
Model | Maestro | Phaeton |
Year Released | 1986 | 1997 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 475 HP |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1990 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 3360 mm |