1986 Austin Maestro vs. 1999 Nissan R 391

To start off, 1999 Nissan R 391 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 4,997 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Nissan R 391 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Nissan R 391 (152 HP @ 3600 RPM) has 86 more horse power than 1986 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Nissan R 391 should accelerate faster than 1986 Austin Maestro.

Because 1999 Nissan R 391 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Nissan R 391. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Austin Maestro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Nissan R 391 (359 Nm) has 257 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm). This means 1999 Nissan R 391 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Austin Maestro. 1999 Nissan R 391 has automatic transmission and 1986 Austin Maestro has manual transmission. 1986 Austin Maestro will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Nissan R 391 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: