1986 Austin Maestro vs. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker
To start off, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 2,499 cc (6 cylinders), 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Chevrolet Tracker weights approximately 625 kg more than 1986 Austin Maestro.
Because 2001 Chevrolet Tracker is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 Austin Maestro. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Chevrolet Tracker (217 Nm) has 115 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm). This means 2001 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Austin Maestro | 2001 Chevrolet Tracker | |
Make | Austin | Chevrolet |
Model | Maestro | Tracker |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 2499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 102 Nm | 217 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 915 kg | 1540 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1700 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2210 mm |