1986 Austin Maestro vs. 2010 Ford E-350
To start off, 2010 Ford E-350 is newer by 24 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Austin Maestro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Austin Maestro would be higher. At 5,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Ford E-350 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford E-350 (177 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 111 more horse power than 1986 Austin Maestro. (66 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford E-350 should accelerate faster than 1986 Austin Maestro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Ford E-350 (184 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Austin Maestro. (102 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2010 Ford E-350 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Austin Maestro.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Austin Maestro | 2010 Ford E-350 | |
Make | Austin | Ford |
Model | Maestro | E-350 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1274 cc | 5400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 66 HP | 177 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 102 Nm | 184 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4437 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1720 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2619 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 34 L | 57 L |