1986 Avanti Avanti vs. 2001 Mazda CU-X
To start off, 2001 Mazda CU-X is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Avanti Avanti. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Avanti Avanti would be higher. At 5,001 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Avanti Avanti is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Avanti Avanti (212 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (99 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Avanti Avanti should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda CU-X. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Avanti Avanti weights approximately 275 kg more than 2001 Mazda CU-X. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Avanti Avanti is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Avanti Avanti. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda CU-X, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Avanti Avanti (400 Nm) has 160 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda CU-X. (240 Nm). This means 1986 Avanti Avanti will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda CU-X.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Avanti Avanti | 2001 Mazda CU-X | |
Make | Avanti | Mazda |
Model | Avanti | CU-X |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Engine Size | 5001 cc | 1970 cc |
Horse Power | 212 HP | 99 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 400 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1620 kg | 1345 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2780 mm | 2680 mm |