1986 Bitter SC vs. 2008 Fiat Bravo
To start off, 2008 Fiat Bravo is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1986 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2008 Fiat Bravo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Bitter SC (249 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Fiat Bravo. (206 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1986 Bitter SC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Fiat Bravo.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Bitter SC | 2008 Fiat Bravo | |
Make | Bitter | Fiat |
Model | SC | Bravo |
Year Released | 1986 | 2008 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2968 cc | 1368 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 177 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 249 Nm | 206 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 1750 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 95 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69.8 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1350 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4920 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1360 mm | 1500 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2690 mm | 2810 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 58 L |