1986 Bitter SC vs. 2009 Chevrolet HHR

To start off, 2009 Chevrolet HHR is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Bitter SC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Bitter SC would be higher. At 2,968 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Bitter SC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (260 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 83 more horse power than 1986 Bitter SC. (177 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR should accelerate faster than 1986 Bitter SC.

Because 1986 Bitter SC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Bitter SC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chevrolet HHR, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chevrolet HHR (353 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 104 more torque (in Nm) than 1986 Bitter SC. (249 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2009 Chevrolet HHR will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1986 Bitter SC.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Bitter SC 2009 Chevrolet HHR
Make Bitter Chevrolet
Model SC HHR
Year Released 1986 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2968 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 177 HP 260 HP
Engine RPM 5800 RPM 5300 RPM
Torque 249 Nm 353 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 2000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 4 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4920 mm 4480 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1360 mm 1610 mm
Wheelbase Size 2690 mm 2640 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 75 L 61 L