1986 BMW 320 vs. 2009 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2009 Ford Ranger is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 BMW 320. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 BMW 320 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Ford Ranger is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 2009 Ford Ranger is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 BMW 320. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Ford Ranger will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 BMW 320 | 2009 Ford Ranger | |
Make | BMW | Ford |
Model | 320 | Ranger |
Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1990 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 141 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4330 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1800 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1830 mm |