1986 BMW M3 vs. 2001 Mazda B2500
To start off, 2001 Mazda B2500 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 BMW M3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 BMW M3 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2001 Mazda B2500 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 BMW M3 (197 HP @ 6750 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2001 Mazda B2500. (82 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2001 Mazda B2500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Mazda B2500 weights approximately 570 kg more than 1986 BMW M3.
Because 2001 Mazda B2500 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 BMW M3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Mazda B2500 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 BMW M3 (240 Nm @ 4750 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Mazda B2500. (194 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1986 BMW M3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Mazda B2500.
Compare all specifications:
1986 BMW M3 | 2001 Mazda B2500 | |
Make | BMW | Mazda |
Model | M3 | B2500 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2001 |
Body Type | Coupe | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2302 cc | 2497 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 197 HP | 82 HP |
Engine RPM | 6750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 240 Nm | 194 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4750 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1170 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4350 mm | 5010 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1690 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1370 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2570 mm | 2990 mm |