1986 BMW Z1 vs. 2000 Chevrolet Triax
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Triax is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 BMW Z1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 BMW Z1 would be higher. At 2,494 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 BMW Z1 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Chevrolet Triax weights approximately 600 kg more than 1986 BMW Z1.
Because 2000 Chevrolet Triax is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1986 BMW Z1. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Triax will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Chevrolet Triax has automatic transmission and 1986 BMW Z1 has manual transmission. 1986 BMW Z1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Chevrolet Triax will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 BMW Z1 | 2000 Chevrolet Triax | |
Make | BMW | Chevrolet |
Model | Z1 | Triax |
Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2494 cc | 660 cc |
Horse Power | 171 HP | 0 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 1598 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 2790 mm |