1986 BMW Z1 vs. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 BMW Z1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 BMW Z1 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country weights approximately 1037 kg more than 1986 BMW Z1.
Because 1986 BMW Z1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 BMW Z1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Town & Country, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country has automatic transmission and 1986 BMW Z1 has manual transmission. 1986 BMW Z1 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Town & Country will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 BMW Z1 | 2009 Chrysler Town & Country | |
| Make | BMW | Chrysler |
| Model | Z1 | Town & Country |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 171 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 7 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 998 kg | 2035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3960 mm | 5010 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1280 mm | 1890 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2440 mm | 3050 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 58 L | 71 L |
