1986 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1955 Cadillac 62
To start off, 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1955 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 248 kg more than 1986 Bristol Beaufighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Bristol Beaufighter | 1955 Cadillac 62 | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Beaufighter | 62 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1955 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5424 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 267 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 2000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2050 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3290 mm |