1986 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 1982 Cadillac Brougham
To start off, 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Brougham would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Cadillac Brougham weights approximately 198 kg more than 1986 Bristol Beaufighter.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Bristol Beaufighter | 1982 Cadillac Brougham | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Beaufighter | Brougham |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5031 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1950 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 3090 mm |