1986 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo
To start off, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 212 kg more than 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo.
Because 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Bristol Beaufighter | 2000 Chevrolet Monte Carlo | |
| Make | Bristol | Chevrolet |
| Model | Beaufighter | Monte Carlo |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 3783 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 197 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1540 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5030 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1850 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2810 mm |
