1986 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2002 Cadillac Eldorado
To start off, 2002 Cadillac Eldorado is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 22 kg more than 2002 Cadillac Eldorado.
Because 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Cadillac Eldorado, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Bristol Beaufighter | 2002 Cadillac Eldorado | |
Make | Bristol | Cadillac |
Model | Beaufighter | Eldorado |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 4572 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 315 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1730 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 5100 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2890 mm |