1986 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2009 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2009 Toyota Matrix is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 422 kg more than 2009 Toyota Matrix.
Because 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Bristol Beaufighter. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Toyota Matrix, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Bristol Beaufighter | 2009 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Bristol | Toyota |
| Model | Beaufighter | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1986 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5898 cc | 2362 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 158 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1330 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2610 mm |
