1986 Bristol Beaufighter vs. 2013 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2013 Ford Mustang is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Bristol Beaufighter. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Bristol Beaufighter would be higher. At 5,898 cc (8 cylinders), 1986 Bristol Beaufighter is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Bristol Beaufighter weights approximately 4 kg more than 2013 Ford Mustang.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1986 Bristol Beaufighter has automatic transmission and 2013 Ford Mustang has manual transmission. 2013 Ford Mustang will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1986 Bristol Beaufighter will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Bristol Beaufighter | 2013 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Bristol | Ford |
Model | Beaufighter | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5898 cc | 5800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 653 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1752 kg | 1748 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4910 mm | 4778 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2035 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1438 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2910 mm | 2720 mm |