1986 Buick LeSabre vs. 1996 Citroen ZX
To start off, 1996 Citroen ZX is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick LeSabre (148 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 1996 Citroen ZX. (67 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 1996 Citroen ZX. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 410 kg more than 1996 Citroen ZX. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Buick LeSabre (271 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 151 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Citroen ZX. (120 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1986 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Citroen ZX.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick LeSabre | 1996 Citroen ZX | |
Make | Buick | Citroen |
Model | LeSabre | ZX |
Year Released | 1986 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1905 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 120 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 2000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1090 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5010 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1460 mm |