1986 Buick LeSabre vs. 2002 Suzuki F1
To start off, 2002 Suzuki F1 is newer by 16 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick LeSabre. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick LeSabre would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Buick LeSabre is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick LeSabre (148 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2002 Suzuki F1. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick LeSabre should accelerate faster than 2002 Suzuki F1. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick LeSabre weights approximately 30 kg more than 2002 Suzuki F1. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 Suzuki F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 Suzuki F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick LeSabre, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Buick LeSabre (271 Nm) has 165 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Suzuki F1. (106 Nm). This means 1986 Buick LeSabre will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Suzuki F1.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick LeSabre | 2002 Suzuki F1 | |
Make | Buick | Suzuki |
Model | LeSabre | F1 |
Year Released | 1986 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 1995 cc |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 271 Nm | 106 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1500 kg | 1470 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2210 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 45 L |