1986 Buick Regal vs. 1982 Cadillac Cimarron
To start off, 1986 Buick Regal is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Cadillac Cimarron would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Regal (235 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. (123 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Regal weights approximately 338 kg more than 1982 Cadillac Cimarron. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1986 Buick Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Buick Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Cadillac Cimarron, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Regal | 1982 Cadillac Cimarron | |
Make | Buick | Cadillac |
Model | Regal | Cimarron |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3791 cc | 2844 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 235 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4400 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1490 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4530 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2580 mm |