1986 Buick Regal vs. 2001 Citroen C2

To start off, 2001 Citroen C2 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Regal (235 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 2001 Citroen C2. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2001 Citroen C2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Regal weights approximately 435 kg more than 2001 Citroen C2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Buick Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Buick Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2001 Citroen C2, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Buick Regal (448 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 338 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Citroen C2. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1986 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Citroen C2.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Buick Regal 2001 Citroen C2
Make Buick Citroen
Model Regal C2
Year Released 1986 2001
Body Type Coupe Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1587 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 448 Nm 110 Nm
Torque RPM 2800 RPM 4000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 96.5 mm 78.5 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 82 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 10.0:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1055 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 3670 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1670 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1470 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2410 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 41 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]