1986 Buick Regal vs. 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer

To start off, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Regal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Regal would be higher. At 3,791 cc (6 cylinders), 1986 Buick Regal is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Regal (235 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 121 more horse power than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. (114 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Regal should accelerate faster than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Regal weights approximately 265 kg more than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1986 Buick Regal is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1986 Buick Regal. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1986 Buick Regal (448 Nm) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer. (176 Nm). This means 1986 Buick Regal will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer.

Compare all specifications:

1986 Buick Regal 2005 Mitsubishi Lancer
Make Buick Mitsubishi
Model Regal Lancer
Year Released 1986 2005
Body Type Coupe Sedan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3791 cc 1999 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 235 HP 114 HP
Engine RPM 4400 RPM 4000 RPM
Torque 448 Nm 176 Nm
Engine Bore Size 96.5 mm 82.1 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86.4 mm 96 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 8.0:1 9.5:1
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1490 kg 1225 kg
Vehicle Length 5100 mm 4590 mm
Vehicle Width 1830 mm 1700 mm
Vehicle Height 1390 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2750 mm 2550 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 50 L