1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1959 Volvo 120
To start off, 1986 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1959 Volvo 120. (76 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1959 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 85 kg more than 1959 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Buick Skyhawk | 1959 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Skyhawk | 120 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1959 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1580 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 76 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 995 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1620 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2610 mm |
