1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1960 Seat 1400
To start off, 1986 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Seat 1400. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Seat 1400 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1960 Seat 1400. (49 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1960 Seat 1400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 15 kg more than 1960 Seat 1400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Seat 1400 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Seat 1400. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 1960 Seat 1400 | |
Make | Buick | Seat |
Model | Skyhawk | 1400 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1394 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1065 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2660 mm |