1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1980 Volvo 66
To start off, 1986 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Buick Skyhawk is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1986 Buick Skyhawk (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 1980 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk should accelerate faster than 1980 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Buick Skyhawk weights approximately 258 kg more than 1980 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1986 Buick Skyhawk | 1980 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Buick | Volvo |
| Model | Skyhawk | 66 |
| Year Released | 1986 | 1980 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 822 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1550 mm |
