1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1982 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1986 Buick Skyhawk is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,942 cc (8 cylinders), 1982 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Ford Mustang (225 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Ford Mustang weights approximately 403 kg more than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1982 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1982 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 1982 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Buick | Ford |
Model | Skyhawk | Mustang |
Year Released | 1986 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4942 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1483 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4560 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2560 mm |