1986 Buick Skyhawk vs. 1990 Volvo 960
To start off, 1990 Volvo 960 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Buick Skyhawk. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Buick Skyhawk would be higher. At 2,922 cc (6 cylinders), 1990 Volvo 960 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1990 Volvo 960 (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1990 Volvo 960 should accelerate faster than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1990 Volvo 960 weights approximately 480 kg more than 1986 Buick Skyhawk. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1990 Volvo 960 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Volvo 960. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1986 Buick Skyhawk, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1986 Buick Skyhawk | 1990 Volvo 960 | |
Make | Buick | Volvo |
Model | Skyhawk | 960 |
Year Released | 1986 | 1990 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2922 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 204 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4560 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1660 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2580 mm | 2780 mm |